Planners should spend the week deciding, not collecting

Module · Planning and Performance

Eight of the nine weeks in a planning cycle go on collection, chasing and re-cutting.

Prophesee FP&A takes that work off the team, reconciles the target and the build by arithmetic rather than by argument, and gives every analyst the means to test an idea and prove it without asking anyone.

Hierarchical coherenceDriver forecastingVariance attributionScenario and counterfactualClassification and mapping
The shift

The budget takes nine weeks. Eight of them are plumbing.

Collection, chasing, version control, re-cutting. The analytical work, the part the team was actually hired for, gets whatever is left of week nine. The target and the build are settled in a room because no mechanism has ever existed to settle them any other way.

9 weeks
The average budgeting cycle, unchanged across three years of the same survey
51%
Of CFOs put improved forecasting accuracy in their top five priorities for 2026, behind only cost optimisation
None
Of the major planning platforms describe reconciling the top-down target with the bottom-up build as a delivered capability. It appears in their guidance as a practice to adopt, not in their products as something that runs

Sources: Association for Financial Professionals, FP&A Benchmarking Survey: Integrated Planning, 2026 (n=332 FP&A and finance professionals across 54 countries) · Association for Financial Professionals, FP&A Benchmarking Survey, May 2025, on planning platform and spreadsheet use · Gartner, 2026 CFO Agenda research, fielded Aug 2025, published Dec 2025 (200+ CFOs) · 3RDi review of published planning platform product pages and product documentation, Aug 2026.

A new approach

From negotiating the number to reconciling it

foresight iconForesight
Today · The annual budget model

The forecast is last year's actuals with a growth rate on top, delivered as one number with no band and no driver. Every reviewer discounts it by their own margin.

A forecast with a band and a driver

Gradient-boosted trees and time series models per line, entity and driver, each projection carrying a confidence interval and ranked drivers. Causality tests which operational series lead the financial one, so a driver is measured, not asserted. Monitored for drift and retrained.

pulse iconPulse
Today · The monthly review pack

The plan is tested against actuals once a month, in a meeting, weeks after the divergence began. Nothing tests the forecast itself, so a miss is reported rather than prevented.

Plan breach detection, mid-quarter

Write the tolerance in plain English: this cost centre, this margin floor, this hiring ramp. Rules run against actuals and the forward projection, so the alert fires when the plan is projected to miss, not at month close. Scored and routed with the action attached.

horizon iconHorizon
Today · The scenario spreadsheet

Scenarios are built once, presented once and never opened again. Nobody tracks whether the chosen one happened, so no plan is ever scored and no decision is ever attributed.

Model the intervention, then track it

Predict the no-action trajectory, model the intervention and watch the projected curve update as the assumption changes. Then track actuals against that plan, with counterfactual modelling separating the effect of the action from what the market would have done anyway.

nexus iconNexus
Today · The chart of accounts

Each ledger carries its own account structure and each entity its own cost centre tree, so the same line means different things in different places.

Ask the plan a question

Ledgers, planning models, headcount systems and written commentary resolved into one graph, with account and cost centre mappings maintained by classification models rather than by hand. Ask in plain language and get the figure with its version, its assumption and the person who owned it.

From challenge to decision

Turning planning challenges into decisions

Problem: Hierarchical coherence
What produces it today: The target and the build

The board sets eight percent. The build says four. The gap closes in a room, by seniority, and reappears as a buffer nobody can find.

Engine: foresight icon Foresight
The applications that replace it: Reconciled PlanBuffer Finder
Problem: Driver forecasting
What produces it today: The annual budget model

One number, carried forward with a growth rate, with no band and no stated driver. So every layer discounts it and adds its own margin.

Engine: foresight icon Foresightnexus icon Nexus
The applications that replace it: Driver ForecastAssumption Ledger
Problem: Variance attribution
What produces it today: The monthly review pack

The number moved and four people spend three days arguing whether it was price, volume, mix or currency before anyone can act.

Engine: foresight icon Foresightpulse icon Pulse
The applications that replace it: Variance BridgeEarly Divergence
Problem: Scenario and counterfactual
What produces it today: The scenario spreadsheet

Three scenarios are built for the board and never opened again. Nothing records which one was chosen or whether it happened.

Engine: horizon icon Horizon
The applications that replace it: Plan What-IfPlan Attribution
Problem: Classification and mapping
What produces it today: The chart of accounts

A new account opens in one ledger and lands in Other for two months, so the group view is quietly wrong and nobody is told.

Engine: nexus icon Nexuspulse icon Pulse
The applications that replace it: Mapping WatchPlan Chat
What becomes possible

12 AI applications that could be relevant

A sample of what becomes possible on the decision layer, not a fixed list: each application draws on the same data foundation and audit trail, and new ones are configured on the engines, not built from scratch.

Foresight
Reconciled Plan

Top-down target and bottom-up build reconciled by arithmetic, with the gap named, sized and owned.

Foresight
Driver Forecast

Every line projected with a confidence band and a ranked list of the drivers behind it.

Foresight
Variance Bridge

Plan to actual decomposed into price, volume, mix, rate and currency before the review, not during it.

Foresight
Buffer Finder

Where the plan carries hidden contingency, by owner and by line, measured against outturn.

Pulse
Early Divergence

The lines that have begun to drift from plan, ranked by projected impact at year end.

Pulse
Plan Breach Rules

Tolerances written in plain English and tested continuously against actuals and the forward projection.

Pulse
Mapping Watch

Account, cost centre and entity mappings maintained continuously, with every drift flagged.

Horizon
Plan What-If

Model the intervention and watch the projected curve update against the target.

Horizon
Plan Attribution

Actuals tracked against the modelled plan, with the counterfactual separating the action from the trend.

Horizon
Target Path

The date the current plan reaches the target, updated as actuals come in.

Nexus
Plan Chat

Ask the plan a question in plain language and get the figure with its version and its assumption.

Nexus
Assumption Ledger

Every assumption behind every version, with its owner, its date and what it changed.

How work changes

A day when the analyst gets to think

Today: A forecast built from twenty submissions, each carrying a buffer nobody can see.

With Prophesee:
08:10foresight icon Foresight
The gap, named and sized

Target against build, reconciled by arithmetic. The gap has an owner and a number before the meeting starts.

Today: A line that started drifting in week three, discussed in the week nine review.

With Prophesee:
11:20pulse icon Pulse
A miss that has not happened yet

Two cost centres are projected to breach plan by the third quarter. Severity scored, routed, with the variance already decomposed.

Today: Three scenarios built for the board, then never opened again.

With Prophesee:
14:00horizon icon Horizon
Model it before you commit

A pricing move tested against a hiring pause on the projected curve. She takes the one that closes the gap without the attrition.

Today: The plan changed. Nobody can say whether the change worked.

With Prophesee:
17:00horizon icon Horizon
Proof, not argument

Last quarter's intervention tracked against the modelled plan, with the counterfactual separating it from the market. That goes to the board.

Tomorrow's plan becomes today's decision.

Improve forecast accuracy

We agree the metric and the baseline in week one, and measure the result on your data.